Taylor Swift When Taylor Swift acknowledged that the catalogue to her first six albums had been sold for a second time without her knowledge, she said she hoped it meant she was free from the record executive who had owned 11 years of master recordings against the pop star’s wishes.
Taylor Swift the best-selling artists
Swift publicly lashed out last year at Scooter Braun after he purchased her former label , Big Machine, claiming that he was guilty of “incessant, manipulative bullying” which she hadn’t been consulted on his purchase of her music rights
Now, she said on Monday, Braun was selling her chart-topping catalogue to a personal equity firm. But instead of celebrating, Swift was fuming about the deal again
After learning that Braun would still profit off her work under the terms of the deal, Swift announced Monday that she had already begun rerecording her first six albums in an effort to regain independence from the chief whose name alone regularly left her in tears
As first reported by Variety, the new deal by Shamrock Holdings for Swift’s master recordings is believed to be for quite $300 million. the worth from those first six albums could eventually reach as high as $450 million, consistent with the outlet
In a post on Twitter, Swift published a replica of a letter she sent to Shamrock Holdings last month informing the California-based firm, which was founded by Walt Disney’s nephew, of her decision to rerecord dozens of songs, including a set of top-10 hits, in order that they might not profit Braun.
“It’s a shame to understand that i will be able to now be unable to assist grow the longer term of those past works and it pains me very deeply to be separated from the music I spent over a decade creating,” wrote Swift on Oct. 28, “but this is often a sacrifice i will be able to need to make to stay Scooter Braun out of my life
Taylor Swift, one among the best-selling artists of all time, said that she had hoped to bid on the master recordings herself, but that she was told she would need to sign a nondisclosure agreement, which the 30-year-old artist declined
bent attempt to broker a partnership, Swift maintained that any relationship the firm had with Braun, 39, was a non-starter
this may diminish the worth of my old masters, but I hope you'll understand that this is often my only way of regaining the sense of pride I once had when hearing songs from my first six albums and also allowing my fans to concentrate to those albums without feelings of guilt for benefiting Scooter,” she wrote
the newest episode during a long-running battle between the record-breaking artist and therefore the influential executive stemming from a web feud that preceded Braun’s ownership of her work.
the 2 are often traced back to at least one of Braun’s chart-topping clients: Kanye West. At the 2009 MTV Video Music Awards, Braun was West’s manager when the rapper jumped onstage and interrupted Swift as she was accepting the award for female video of the year in an infamous moment
call of the 2 artists talking about the song, branding her a “snake” for publicly playing the victim. Swift’s publicist contended that there was no discussion about using the vulgar term within the song
came the combination when he posted a taunting screenshot of him, West and therefore the manager seemingly laughing at the backlash Swift faced following the discharge of the recording. He later apologized
Tensions increased in June 2019 when Braun’s Ithaca Holdings purchased Big Machine, the Nashville-based independent record label, for about $300 million. The rights to Swift’s catalogue alone, believed to be worth around $140 million, were a big point within the deal for a label featuring acts like Sheryl Crow, Florida Georgia Line and woman A, the group formerly referred to as Lady Antebellum
Taylor Swift said that Braun buying her catalogue was a “worst-case scenario
“Never in my worst nightmares did I imagine the customer would be Scooter,” she wrote on Tumblr, describing Braun as “the definition of toxic male privilege in our industry
After she accused Braun and her former label of blocking her music from being included at an awards show and during a Netflix special, the chief said last November that he and his family received anonymous death threats, and pleaded with Swift to finish their social media back-and-forth. chatting with Variety last year, Braun suggested he was willing to talk with Swift, saying, “I don’t know where we got tousled along the way that we decided being correctness is more important than having conflict resolution
As she was trying to enter into negotiations with him over the master recordings, Swift released in February the music video for “The Man,” including direct references about her disdain for Braun and his ownership of her music. within the music video, Swift’s chauvinistic male friend , Tyler, who is employed to skewer toxic masculinity and double standards, is shown urinating on a terminal wall covered in graffiti referencing the titles of the five No. 1 albums that were under Braun’s ownership. The Washington Post’s Katie Shepherd and Allyson Chiu acknowledged that there was also a symbol of a scooter with a red circle and line cutting through it, meaning, “No Scooters allowed